Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual length of service virtually violates all the service composition like a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention with the law nor from the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this can be a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents in the boy or Lady never approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this sort of an appeal hasn't yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
While there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent inside the home state, relevant case regulation from another state may be regarded because of the court.
In the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court inside the United States. Lower courts on the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its own judicial system that incorporates trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every single state is commonly referred to since the “supreme” court, Though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Though state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.
The legislation as set up in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Only the written opinions with the Supreme Court as well as the Court of Appeals are routinely available. Decisions in the lessen (trial) courts will not be generally published or dispersed.
Summaries provide an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and policies aimed at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nevertheless they have check here did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there might be a person or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason to the decision in the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted within an argument.
Criminal cases From the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Not like most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions constant with the previous decisions of higher courts.